The following figure is our best estimate of the historical usage of five common commercial software packages over last 10 years: However many articles can now be full-text searched through systems like Google Scholar, so that a comparison is possible with a little effort.Īn especially powerful feature in Google Scholar is the automatic searching for similar terms that differ only in whitespace or capitalization. It is hard to get reliable numbers because most commercial software is not cited in the references, and therefore not tracked properly by systems like Scopus and Web of Science (instructions on how to correctly cite Geneious can be found here on our support site). We were interested in how many scientists have been using Geneious in their published research compared with other commercial software packages for sequence analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |